Almond trees in bloom --
Like mine their heads have turned white.
Snow on the mountain --
An old man in a white shawl.
And yet -- and yet! -- new Spring grass!
Almond trees in bloom --
Like mine their heads have turned white.
Snow on the mountain --
An old man in a white shawl.
And yet -- and yet! -- new Spring grass!
When I was little, I'd hear my parents talk during flu season about the bug that was currently going around, and I thought they meant, you know, a BUG.
When I was little, when grownups talked about "kid gloves" I thought they meant the gloves kids like me wore to play cowboys.
When I was little, when the grownups said "taking things for granted" I thought they were saying "taking things for granite."
Well now! I know it is methodological madness to mix the author up with the narrator. Nevertheless, here is a conjecture: Mr. Kipling was someone who could see and remember any number of faces while awake. Part of his creative gift was that he could emphatically see and pay attention to anyone he met. Yet here he has the narrator saying, "I have never seen the faces of my dead in any dream.""Not since I can remember. It happened when I was only a few months old, they told me. And yet I must remember something, else how could I dream about colours. I see light in my dreams, and colours, but I never see them. I only hear them just as I do when I am awake.""It's difficult to see faces in dreams. Some people can, but most of us haven't the gift," I went on, looking up at the window where the child stood all but hidden."I've heard that too," she said. "And they tell me that one never sees a dead person's face in a dream. Is that true?""I believe it is -- now I come to think of it.""But how is it with yourself -- yourself?" The blind eyes turned towards me."I have never seen the faces of my dead in any dream," I answered."Then it must be as bad as being blind."
"An alternative to the synchrocyclotron is the isochronous cyclotron, which has a magnetic field that increases with radius, rather than with time."
...the electronvolt was devised as a standard unit of measure through its usefulness in electrostatic particle accelerator sciences, because a particle with electric charge q has an energy E = qV after passing through the potential V; if q is quoted in integer units of the elementary charge and the potential in volts, one gets an energy in eV.Hmm. You don't say!
Every Halloween we are treated to images of ghosts with rattling
chains. In Charles Dickens' "A Christmas Carol," Mr. Scrooge is
confronted by the shade of his old business partner. Marley's Ghost
is chained and burdened by cashboxes, coin purses, locks. The things
that occupied Marley's thoughts are supposed to bind him to earth
after death.
Bah, humbug! The image may function for the plot of Dickens' ghost
story, but it hardly jives with my world-view, let alone my
"other-world"-view!
In my dreams my mother walks without a limp. In my dreams my father
is healthy, unworried, well-rested.
No, I don't think it's the shades of those whom we have lost who bear
the chains.
The chains are the ones I carry. The chains are the burdens of
accumulated grieving, loss after loss. The chains are the regrets and
second thoughts and wish-I-hads. The chains are the freedom I dare
not grant myself -- perhaps the freedom to be angry at Dad. Or
perhaps the freedom to create my own standard for being ME, a
standard that would not be always a comparison, a relative judgment
about me *as* son, or me *as* friend (or me *as* blogger).
Are my chains, my burdens, ones I *choose* to carry? Why should there
be something inescapable, something inevitable, about the burdens
*others* put upon us? Oh, how I wish I knew the ins and outs of the
countless little habits I have developed over the years, habits for
making my chains seem normal, necessary, even *deserved*.
Many of the links in my chains are negative memories. Some of the
locks are believing that I failed to meet expectations. Here is a
coffer full of guilt. Here is a cashbox filled with the coin of
resentments.
Every relationship -- even the very best -- has challenges and
difficulties. I keep saying that one of the principal tasks of grief
is to find a way to keep our love alive in spite of the fact that the
one we love is gone. I am barely beginning to learn how to deal with
the fact that the challenges and difficulties, the bumps and
barriers, have not gone away.
But now the relationship is a bit single-sided, no? If the bumps are
going to be smoothed, it is I who will have to do the smoothing.
I know: how 'bout if I work on forgiving ME for the failures and the messes?
Mom would if Mom were here. Dad would if Dad were here.
There is a song by Aeone that says in part:
From a point of faith within my head
I believe in all the choices I have made;
From a point of love within my heart
I forgive myself for all of my mistakes.
O wad some Pow'r the giftie gie usOn second thought, I will pass on the subjective lenses and go on seeing myself as richer, younger, healthier, and handsomer than I may look to "ithers."
To see oursels as ithers see us!